Anthony J. Pennings, PhD

WRITINGS ON DIGITAL ECONOMICS, ENERGY STRATEGIES, AND GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS

Electric Money Never Sleeps

Posted on | June 27, 2011 | No Comments

Money used to sleep a lot. It would nap while waiting for a telex message to go out. It would doze off while waiting for a telephone connection. It would slumber on railroad routes. It would hibernate on transoceanic crossings. By the mid-20th century, money developed insomnia.

Computers and telecommunications were being used together to add a new immediacy to financial transactions. Reuters created a new online facility for international currency trading in the early 1970s and Bloomberg followed up in the next decade with the “Bloomberg Box” to allow traders to analyze and trade Treasuries and other equities. Geosynchronous satellites and undersea fiber optic cables provided a new technological environment for the movement of money and news. Combined with faster micro-processing capacity, it created new transactional spaces so that money did not have to sleep; it became continuously active. Electric money was 24/7, and it was global.

I wrote my Masters thesis on international finance and telecommunications deregulation, so I had a lot of interest in two of Oliver Stone’s films: Wall Street (1986) and the recent Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps (2010). In Deregulation and the Telecommunications Structure of Transnationally Integrated Financial Industries, I examined the forces that were transforming the technological infrastructure for banking, currencies, derivatives and other financial activities. These financial industries have been a major driver of computerization and communications technologies since the 1970s. Consequently, the emergent financial technologies have transformed the spatial and temporal limitations on OTC (over-the-counter) transactions and bypassed the barriers to international data communications and the flows of information and money.

These developments that led to money’s insomnia provide the backdrop for Stone’s Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps (2010). This film is not as enjoyable as his classic Wall Street (1986) which I argued used the icons of a gangster film moved from New York City’s outer boroughs to heart of its official economy. In “Figuring Criminality in Oliver Stone’s Wall Street” I examined both the iconographics that Stone uses to dramatize his morality tale as well as the dynamics of the new era of global electronic finance.

In this latest film, Michael Douglas revives his role as Gordon Gekko, but he is no longer the “Master of the Universe”, pontificating the “greed is good” mantra. He emerges from jail in the beginning of the movie to find instead that his universe is a lonely one, having lost his wife to divorce, his son to drugs, and the affections of his only child, a daughter named Winnie, to Jake Moore, a young trader. Jake works at a venerable Wall Street company caught up in the credit crisis. Played by Shia Labeouf, he seems to lack Charlie Sheen’s Adonis DNA, but the comparison is unfair. More palpable is his character’s lack of depth emanating from the dramatic and narrative limitations of the story.

It’s clear that the story that Stone wanted to tell was the one about the financial crash and the resultant “Great Recession” so that is the direction I’m going here. The story is personal for Stone whose father was a stockbroker on Wall Street and Wall Street the film series has been his main vehicle to grapple with this issue. But Wall Street has changed a lot since Stone’s father was a broker in 1960s. He might have seen the automation crisis that accompanied the turn of that decade but not likely the financial derivatives phenomenon which started in Chicago during the 1970s and began to take hold on Wall Street in the 1980s.

What drove the derivative markets were the combination of algorithms such as the Black-Scholes equation and microprocessing power that enabled quick calculations on the trading floors. But even the exchanges notable for their frenetic energy and strange hand signals are seeing their demise as online trading platforms replace the face-to-face “open outcry” trading floors. Soon traders spent most of their time behind desks, coolly scanning economic data and trading trends while setting up parameters for automated trades.

By the 1990s, automated systems merged with hedge funds to trade a global buffet of new electronic instruments. The new hedging strategies not only exploited the global diversity of financial trades from developed and emerging markets, their risk models depended on them. “Dynamic hedging” was based on the capability to trade anywhere and all the time. Money truly never slept.

Most notable of the new hedge funds was Long-term Capital Management, the Greenwich Connecticut-based financial firm that John Meriwether, the famed bond trader from Salomon Brothers put together with 2 Nobel Prize winners and 80 founding members putting up the minimum investment of $10 million. LTCM’s computerized trades made good money for three years before the “Asian Contagion” and the collapse of the Russian market in 1998 sparked a major disturbance in the global markets that their systems hadn’t anticipated. When Russia defaulted on its debt in August of that year, LTCM lost billions and put a trillion dollars of trading at risk throughout the world. The subsequent global flight to US treasuries and the tech markets destroyed LTCM and nearly brought down the US financial system.

This Frontline video with the same name provides an interesting historical analysis.

Oliver Stone’s Wall Street: Money Never Sleep picks up the story and addresses the financial crisis of 2007-2008. One could say it started with the securitization of student loans for college students in the 1980s, accelerated in the 1990s when Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae used these techniques for home mortgages, and turned a major fiasco when Wall Street began to package mortgage-backed securities into collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) for global distribution. The low-interest rates set by the Federal Reserve Bank that was trying to recover from successive “dot-com”, 9/11 and telecom crashes set off the housing bubble that was fueled by this securitization process.

As in any bubble, people leaped in to buy lest they are left out. Add to this ratings agencies that were paid for their evaluations by the over-leveraged banks and the credit default swaps set up as insurance policies on futile instruments and you have the recipe for the greatest financial disaster since the Great Depression.

Anthony

Anthony J. Pennings, PhD was on the NYU faculty since 2001 teaching digital media, information systems management, and global economics. © ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Online Media Business Models: The Intercontinental Interview

Posted on | June 25, 2011 | No Comments

Recently I was contacted by Stanislav Serdyukov, a second year Master’s program “Media Management” student in Moscow, Russia at the School of Business and Political Journalism at National Research University – Higher School of Economics. He is working on the master’s project with the theme “The Online Media Business Models and their Transformations” and wanted to ask me some questions about online media business models.

Q. What factors cause the origin of new online media business models?

I think the simple answers are technology and customer expectations. Media consumers are busy and they want their content where and when they want it. Digital technology has disrupted traditional media models and the empowered the media consumer – so far. One way to start thinking about this topic is by reflecting on Nielsen’s 3 screen strategy. The venerable ratings agency is now tracking attentive eyeballs on PCs and mobile phones as well as televisions. These viewing options expanded the time and place of viewing media and challenge the traditional media models and in the process they have created a more demanding media customer. Having said that though I think innovation is driving these services, creating new services customers didn’t even know they wanted, creating a “cool” factor when unanticipated new apps, technology and services are released, literally “blowing people’s minds”.

Q. How can online media firms renew their business model in the dynamic media industry?

From the business perspective it’s all about competitive advantage, something that has been hard to obtain in the web world. How can a company create or utilize barriers to entry to keep other companies from competing with them?

It is unfortunate in many ways, but the “app” is a vehicle to reduce competition on the Internet. How many apps do you have on your Droid X? On your iPad? When you are mobile you generally look to reduce your options so the apps are convenient. How many apps do you actually use? Compare that to the links you interact with when you get on your PC or MacBook at home.

Mobile devices are quite small for the web model – physically. How much space do you have smartphone? How small do you want the icons to be? How long is your thumb? The app will capture customers by limiting their options like the web never could. I’m sorry to say.

3. What are the future challenges for the online media business models?

I think money, people making payments, is a real issue. As is a related issue, security. Companies that tie in customers with comfortable payment systems like Amazon and Netflix have real advantages. People love the advantages of e-commerce and the social media aspects of the web, but are extremely wary of identity theft, fraud, malware and other problems that come with giving up personal information and making purchases over the Internet.

All this discussion about “free” is useful too. Free has always been an important model for the broadcast industry in that advertisers picked up the costs of production and distribution. Interesting that Netflix has challenged that model with a subscription model – remember that cable television started off in the US promising an ad-free environment. Now you have pay the subscription fee and suffer the ads. Cable has managed to maintain some key sources of competitive advantage: government protection, customer captivity, and fixed costs such as their huge investments in the network infrastructure. Media industries will have to continue to figure that calculus between ads and subscription prices. The higher the subscription costs, the lower the customer base, and the less interested advertisers will be. Its interesting to the see the New York Times has had some success with their new subscription model but other newspapers may not have the base of high income readers that don’t know how (or care) to clear their cookie cache. Media firms, particularly, news organizations need to come to grips with ads and economics of the Internet.

The “freemium” model is popular now and it makes a lot of sense. Sites build up a large customer base by offering a free service and then offer a premium service at a price. Picture sites are good at this, Flickr provides free storage services to the general public and makes money by offering advanced services to more serious photographers for a price. I noticed Skype is aggressively trying to move people into the premium paid services after their purchase by Microsoft last month as is Linkedin, after its recent IPO. Another strategy is to offer something free and then sell other products to produce a revenue stream. Fotki.com, another picture site, makes money by selling products like coffee cups, mousepads, and refrigerator magnets customized with user images along with traditional images used for framing.

4. What online media business models will be efficient during next five years?

Content continues to be overrated. Anytime you can get someone else to produce your content you are ahead of the game. Content is expensive and extremely interchangeable. Digital cameras, mobile camcorders are providing a lot of useful “user-generated” content and of course anytime you do a search you are producing statistical content that companies like Google are increasingly able to monetize. Just because you are not paying for something, it doesn’t mean someone is not making money from your online activities.

Syndication is also an important dynamic to consider. The process has been around for awhile. Think cartoons in your local paper. But it is particularly effective in an online environment. Think RSS feeds. Syndication is basically selling the same thing again and again. Hard to do with a car and hamburgers but possible with digital processes and products where the costs of reproduction and distribution are nil.

It’s hard to think 5 years into the future, but it’s clear one trend is that consumers are putting the ‘commune” back into communication. I’m talking about social media here. This is working itself out in three ways. One is that they want to interact with content, question it, explore it further, and add to it. Shopping is a much richer experience now due to all the information and reviews you can access online. Much better in many cases than dealing with a pushy salesperson, if you can track one down. Second, consumers want to share the media content with others. By sharing they express themselves and construct an identity. Facebook as been great for this. People are sharing their intimate photos, revealing their links with other people, and attaching media content that they find interesting. Mimetic desire is an important factor here. That is a theory of desire that recognizes that people develop interests based on the interests of people they are interested in. Third, they want to connect with people who share the same interest and interact with them. Whether it is organized around a football team, a pop singer, or a political cause, people are interested in being part of a community that shares the same meanings, goals, and values.

Anthony

Anthony J. Pennings, PhD has been on the NYU faculty since 2001 teaching digital media, information systems management, and global communications. © ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Smith Effect III: Adam Smith, the Census Machine, and the Beginnings of IBM

Posted on | June 20, 2011 | No Comments

This is the third in a three part exploration of Adam Smith and how his ideas laid the foundation for information technology (IT). Here I specifically explore connections between his theories and the formation of IBM which last week celebrated its 100th birthday.

This post further develops the thesis that Adam Smith’s new conception of wealth set the foundation for modern information practices and calculating technologies. The premise of this section is that the new system of economic understanding engendered by Adam Smith, the Scottish philosopher and author of the Wealth of Nations (1776), laid an important intellectual foundation for modern information technologies.

Smith contended that the wealth of a nation lay not in the riches gathered by the monarch but rather in the enterprise and productivity of the population. This had the effect of helping to transform a system of calculation, “political arithmatik,” designed to tally the wealth of the sovereign, into statistics (“state-tistics”), a system of measuring a wide range of economic and social activities.

Smith is mainly known for his notion of the “invisible hand” – God’s infusion of the world with a regulatory system based on individual human desiring. However, his reconceptualization of governmental wealth reverberated through time to stimulate the development of information technologies.

This “Smith Effect” grew in importance, especially as modern computerized bureaucracies emerged and “electronic” monetary policy became heavily reliant on the surveying capacity of modern statistical techniques. Smith, while generally accredited with ideas used to argue for the limitation of the state, also set the foundations for modern bureaucratic states and extensive surveillance systems dependent on information technologies.

This new direction in governmental activities led to continual interest and innovations in mechanical calculations and statistical measurements.

Consequently, it can be argued that the Smith effect resulted in Herman Hollerith’s tabulating machines, created for the 1890 US Census. These technologies eventually became the foundational product that led to the formation of International Business Machines (IBM). The Constitutional Convention of 1787 mandated the counting of Americans every ten years.

Still, by the late 19th century the American population had increased to the point where calculations were nearly impossible to compute using non-mechanical means. Immigration surged after the Civil War, and the whole idea of census-taking nearly became obsolete because of the complexity of the task. By the time one census was finished, it was almost time to do the next one.

Hollerith’s machine became an immediate success and prospered mainly due to the process of “Morganization” occurring in major companies at the time. J.P. Morgan was consolidating several similar companies under names such as AT&T, General Electric, New York Central Railroad, and US Steel. These companies had significant data processing needs that required the telegraph for transmitting information from various locations to tabulating machines that would aggregate information for reports to upper management.

Failing in health, Hollerith sold his business to Charles Flint in 1911. Flint merged the enterprise with two other companies to form the Computing Tabulating Recording Corporation. IBM celebrated this merger as its centennial marker in 2011.

CTR changed its name to International Business Machines (IBM) in 1924 after it purchased German tabulating firm Deutsche Hollerith Maschinen Groupe (Dehomag). Under the leadership of former NCR and indicted supersalesmen, Thomas Watson, IBM expanded to other countries interested in tallying their own populations. In the 1920s and 1930s, IBM began to comb the world, selling its tabulating machines and personalized census services to countries like Russia and Nazi Germany. The punch-card tabulating systems were then generalized for a wide range of commercial and government purposes, including monitoring racial politics as well as parts management for the Luftewaffe, Germany’s air force.

In the US, IBM got the Social Security contract that supported them through the Great Depression. Former IBM salesman Ross Perot would follow that model by getting Medicare contracts to help build his company EDS. It was the son, Thomas Watson, Jr., who guided IBM into the electronic computer age during the Cold War.

Citation APA (7th Edition)

Pennings, A.J. (2011, June 20). Smith Effect III: Adam Smith, the Census Machine, and the Beginnings of IBM. apennings.com. https://apennings.com/dystopian-economies/adam-smith-the-census-machine-and-beginnings-of-ibm/

Ⓒ ALL RIGHTS RESERVED



AnthonybwAnthony J. Pennings, PhD is a Professor at the Department of Technology and Society, State University of New York, Korea. From 2002-2012 was on the faculty of New York University where he taught comparative political economy, digital economics and traditional macroeconomics. He also taught in Digital Media MBA atSt. Edwards University in Austin, Texas, where he lives when not in the Republic of Korea.

All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace – The Poem

Posted on | June 19, 2011 | No Comments

I’m following and commenting on the BBC documentary series All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace by Adam Curtis. So, I wanted to post the actual poem and reading by American poet Richard Brautigan.

I think it beautifully textualizes the early utopian vision of computers and nature working in harmony to provide a stable ecosystem for humans and other forms of life on what Buckminster Fuller refers to in the second episode as “Spaceship Earth.”

I don’t hold out a lot of hope for utopian ideas and actually spent some of my PhD dissertation critiquing both utopianism and dystopianism, but I find this series thought-provoking and worth some time. Here is the poem “All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace.”

“I like to think (and
the sooner the better!)
of a cybernetic meadow
where mammals and computers
live together in mutually
programming harmony
like pure water
touching clear sky.
I like to think
(right now, please!)
of a cybernetic forest
filled with pines and electronics
where deer stroll peacefully
past computers
as if they were flowers
with spinning blossoms.
I like to think
(it has to be!)
of a cybernetic ecology
where we are free of our labors
and joined back to nature,
returned to our mammal
brothers and sisters,
and all watched over
by machines of loving grace.”

— Richard Brautigan – All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace (1967) [1]

And read in his original voice:

Citation APA (7th Edition)

Pennings, A.J. (2011, Jun 19) All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace – The Poem. apennings.com https://apennings.com/how-it-came-to-rule-the-world/all-watched-over-by-machines-of-loving-grace-the-poem/

Share

Notes

[1] Transcript of the poem from Chris Hunt’s blog
Share

© ALL RIGHTS RESERVED



AnthonybwAnthony J. Pennings, PhD is a Professor at the Department of Technology and Society, State University of New York, Korea and Research Professor at Stony Brook University. He teaches broadband policy and ICT for sustainable development. Previously, he was on the faculty of New York University where he taught digital economics and media management. He also taught in the Digital Media MBA at St. Edwards University in Austin, Texas, where he lives when not in South Korea.

All Watched Over by Heroes of Loving Grace

Posted on | June 12, 2011 | No Comments

I’m working on my manuscript How IT Came to Rule the World this summer so not surprisingly I took an interest in the recent BBC documentary by Adam Curtis called All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace, named after American poet Richard Brautigan’s publication of the same name. The title poem was written in 1967 while he was a poet-in-residence at the California Institute of Technology. It reflects on the Utopian possibilities of a society where the advancements in cybernetic technology leads to a world where the need for human labor is diminished, and the Earth returns a state of nature that is balanced with the demands of its human population.

I was intrigued with “Episode One – Love and Power,” which starts with exploring Ayn Rand and her influence on the rise of computer and financial technology during the 1980s and 1990s. Rand was the author of two novels, The Fountainhead (1943) and Atlas Shrugged (1957) which presented her theories known as objectivism. This philosophy stresses heroic individualism, human rationality, and free-market capitalism. I can’t say I’m a Randian (if that is what they call themselves), but this does fit in with my understanding that the Cold War produced many technological innovations ripe for entrepreneurial commercialization in the late 1970s and early 1980s.

The documentary uses Rand to explore the motivations of financiers and entrepreneurs, many of whom claimed to be inspired by her books. Adam Curtis takes particular delight in the story of Alan Greenspan, an early devotee of Rand, who became the “most powerful man in the world” as the Federal Reserve Chairman from 1987 to 2006. Notable was his speech on December 5, 1996, in which he expressed his concerns about “irrational exuberance” when the DJIA stock market went over 6,000 and his subsequent dismissal of this concern. Greenspan quickly embraced the stock market and guided it to over 11,000 before he retired. Also mentioned is his embrace of the “new economy” during the dot.com bubble of the late 1990s. This process included the globalization of financial markets that led to the Asian contagion and the promise of the electronic securitization environment for mortgages that led to the credit crisis of 2008.

Missing from the Alan Curtis analysis, though, is the larger social context of the time. By the late 1970s, the counter-cultural reaction to “The Establishment” of the “Nifty Fifty” corporations and their complicity in the Vietnam War and what President Eisenhower called the “military-industrial complex” was morphing into a new critique of big government “Liberalism.” Many believed that the US was becoming a “Welfare State” that was redistributing not only wealth, but also opportunity and privilege. These tensions were even more evident in Curtis’ England, which, in the wake of their imperial demise and impoverishment during World War I and II, nationalized their major industries, entrenched their labor unions, and implemented wage and price controls to fight off the inflation of the 1970s.

What emerged was a new cultural era of self-based “heroic” philosophies espoused by a divergent group of proponents. These included authors such as Rand and George Gilder (Wealth and Poverty); (Wealth and Poverty); economists such as Arthur Laffer, who championed supply-side economics, and Milton Friedman of the Chicago School; and self-help gurus such as Scientology’s L. Ron Hubbard, est’s Werner Erhard, and fire-walker Tony Robbins. Even heroic popular culture icons in Star Wars and the Superman movies helped characterize the new era.

By the 1980s, political operatives such as Keith Joseph and Margaret Thatcher in England and Ronald Reagan in the US benefited from this trend. Each affirmed heroic entrepreneurial action and sanctioned the market-based capitalism that helped commercialize the fruits of the Cold War into the computers, data networks, and satellites of the new digital age – the machines of loving grace?

The loss of collective responsibility did not come without its consequences. The excessive focus on individualism and the rejection of public solutions led to a tragic underinvestment in public infrastructure, including education. It created a tax structure that encouraged exporting jobs and industries to unregulated and exploitative markets. It capitulated in the deregulation of financial markets, leading to destructive asset bubbles and endangered democratic prospects by enhancing class divisions and reducing the viability of the middle class.

Citation APA (7th Edition)

Pennings, A.J. (2011, Jun 12). All Watched Over by Heroes of Loving Grace. apennings.com https://apennings.com/how-it-came-to-rule-the-world/all-watched-over-by-heroes-of-loving-grace/

Share

© ALL RIGHTS RESERVED



AnthonybwAnthony J. Pennings, PhD is a Professor at the Department of Technology and Society, State University of New York, Korea teaching broadband policy and ICT for sustainable development. From 2002-2012 he was on the faculty of New York University where he taught digital economics and information systems management. He also taught in the Digital Media MBA at St. Edwards University in Austin, Texas, where he lives when not in South Korea.

Setting Up Your IT/Media Enterprise as an LLC

Posted on | June 9, 2011 | No Comments

First off, I am neither an accountant nor an attorney so by all means obtain proper counsel for setting up your business.

That said, I’m often asked about setting up a company and wanted to point out some options and things to think about when starting up your business. In particular, you should look at the benefits of setting it up as a limited liability company (LLC).

The major options for creating a company are a sole proprietorship, partnership, and corporation, although an interesting legal option is the limited liability company. Although not recognized by the Federal government for tax purposes, this valid legal form combines some benefits of a corporation, particularly the limited liability, with the more manageable aspects of the partnership or sole ownership. Note, it is a company, not a corporation, and it can be used for non-profit status but presents a few challenges tax-wise.

You can go to one of the many online services to set up your LLC. For example LegalZoom will allow you to form your company over the Internet and charter it in most any state including Delaware, a popular “location” due to its history of corporate law. They will prepare and also file your paperwork with Delaware’s Division of Corporations.

This would include the Articles of Organization that lists the name of the company (must include LLC abbreviated or written out), mailing address, duration (perpetual or for a set amount of time) , state location (ie Delaware), organization and management structure, initial contributions, etc. They may also assist in conducting a name search, establishing a trademark, getting a tax ID, and even filing for a patent.

Once your articles of organization have been successfully filed, your LLC begins its existence as a legal business entity. One of the first things you need to do is to get a bank account. For that you will need your articles of organization that proves you have a business license, the tax identification number (or EIN number) and the authorized members of the LLC. You might want to talk to a banker first, they can get probably advise and get you a Tax ID for free (vs. $75 at LegalZoom)

Something you must think seriously about is an Operating Agreement. This is not required by the state but is one of the most important steps in maintaining your liability protection, preventing disagreements between the members, and raising additional capital. An operating agreement specifies members’ ownership percentages, the members’ draw or salary, bonus distributions, and any privileges or enhanced ownership rights given to any members. The management plan should also include the duties, rights, and responsibilities of non-members employees.

Anthony

Anthony J. Pennings, PhD has been on the NYU faculty since 2001 teaching digital media, information systems management, and global communications. © ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

G-8 Declares Support for Internet’s Role in Democratic Movements

Posted on | June 2, 2011 | No Comments

The G8 Declaration:
Renewed Commitment for Freedom and Democracy

May 26-27, 2011 (released on May 27, 2011)

The Group of 8 nations (G-8) recently met in Deauville, France and among other issues, affirmed the role of the Internet2011-g8-logo. The Obama administration has taken a more multilateral approach to world affairs than the previous administration and the Internet has not received much attention by the G-8 since the Clinton Administration. It also directed attention to other issues such as nuclear safety, climate change and biodiversity; as well economic issues such as trade, innovation, green growth and accountability on development issues.

No doubt, the role of Facebook and Twitter in recent democratic movements in the Middle East provided motivation for the statement. Many members are part of NATO which is currently engaged in military action in Libya in support of ousting long-time dictator Muammar Gaddafi, who has ruled that country for nearly 42 years.

The issue of net neutrality was given a nod while strong support was expressed for the role of intellectual property protections, prompting concern by Russia.

Questions linger about the relevancy of the G-8 which only includes one BRIC nation, Russia. The other current members are the US, Canada, France, Italy, Germany, Japan, and the United Kingdom.

The text is as follows:

II. Internet

4. All over the world, the Internet has become essential to our societies, economies and their growth.

5. For citizens, the Internet is a unique information and education resource and thus can be a helpful tool to promote freedom, democracy and human rights.

6. For business, the Internet has become an essential and irreplaceable tool for the conduct of commerce and development of relations with consumers. The Internet is a driver of innovation, improves efficiency, and thus contributes to growth and employment.

7. For governments, the Internet is a tool for a more efficient administration, for the provision of services to the public and businesses, and for enhancing their relations with citizens and ensuring respect for and promotion of human rights.

8. The Internet has become a major driver for the global economy, its growth and innovation.

9. The openness, transparency and freedom of the Internet have been key to its development and success. These principles, together with those of non-discrimination and fair competition, must continue to be an essential force behind its development.

10. Their implementation must be included in a broader framework: that of respect for the rule of law, human rights and fundamental freedoms, the protection of intellectual property rights, which inspire life in every democratic society for the benefit of all citizens. We strongly believe that freedom and security, transparency and respect for confidentiality, as well as the exercise of individual rights and responsibility have to be achieved simultaneously. Both the framework and principles must receive the same protection, with the same guarantees, on the Internet as everywhere else.

11. The Internet has become the public arena for our time, a lever of economic development and an instrument for political liberty and emancipation. Freedom of opinion, expression, information, assembly and association must be safeguarded on the Internet as elsewhere. Arbitrary or indiscriminate censorship or restrictions on access to the Internet are inconsistent with States’ international obligations and are clearly unacceptable. Furthermore, they impede economic and social growth.

12. The Internet and its future development, fostered by private sector initiatives and investments, require a favourable, transparent, stable and predictable environment, based on the framework and principles referred to above. In this respect, action from all governments is needed through national policies, but also through the promotion of international cooperation.

13. We commit to encourage the use of the Internet as a tool to advance human rights and democratic participation throughout the world.

14. The global digital economy has served as a powerful economic driver and engine of growth and innovation. Broadband Internet access is an essential infrastructure for participation in today’s economy. In order for our countries to benefit fully from the digital economy, we need to seize emerging opportunities, such as cloud computing, social networking and citizen publications, which are driving innovation and enabling growth in our societies. As we adopt more innovative Internet-based services, we face challenges in promoting interoperability and convergence among our public policies on issues such as the protection of personal data, net neutrality, transborder data flow, ICT security, and intellectual property.

15. With regard to the protection of intellectual property, in particular copyright, trademarks, trade secrets and patents, we recognize the need to have national laws and frameworks for improved enforcement. We are thus renewing our commitment to ensuring effective action against violations of intellectual property rights in the digital arena, including action that addresses present and future infringements. We recognize that the effective implementation of intellectual property rules requires suitable international cooperation of relevant stakeholders, including with the private sector. We are committed to identifying ways of facilitating greater access and openness to knowledge, education and culture, including by encouraging continued innovation in legal on line trade in goods and content, that are respectful of intellectual property rights.

16. The effective protection of personal data and individual privacy on the Internet is essential to earn users’ trust. It is a matter for all stakeholders: the users who need to be better aware of their responsibility when placing personal data on the Internet, the service providers who store and process this data, and governments and regulators who must ensure the effectiveness of this protection. We encourage the development of common approaches taking into account national legal frameworks, based on fundamental rights and that protect personal data, whilst allowing the legal transfer of data.

17. The security of networks and services on the Internet is a multi-stakeholder issue. It requires coordination between governments, regional and international organizations, the private sector, civil society and the G8’s own work in the Roma-Lyon group, to prevent, deter and punish the use of ICTs for terrorist and criminal purposes. Special attention must be paid to all forms of attacks against the integrity of infrastructure, networks and services, including attacks caused by the proliferation of malware and the activities of botnets through the Internet. In this regard, we recognize that promoting users’ awareness is of crucial importance and that enhanced international cooperation is needed in order to protect critical resources, ICTs and other related infrastructure. The fact that the Internet can potentially be used for purposes that are inconsistent with the objectives of peace and security, and may adversely affect the integrity of critical systems, remains a matter of concern. Governments have a role to play, informed by a full range of stakeholders, in helping to develop norms of behaviour and common approaches in the use of cyberspace. On all these issues, we are determined to provide the appropriate follow-up in all relevant fora.

18. We call upon all stakeholders to combat the use of Internet for trafficking in children and for their sexual exploitation. We will also work towards developing an environment in which children can safely use the Internet by improving children’s Internet literacy including risk awareness, and encouraging adequate parental controls consistent with the freedom of expression.

19. We recognize the importance of enhanced access to the Internet for developing countries. Important progress has been achieved since the Okinawa Summit and we pay tribute to the efforts made by developing countries in this regard as well as the various stakeholders, governments, the private sector and NGOs, which provide resources, expertise and innovation. We encourage initiatives, in partnership with the private sector, on the use of the Internet with a development purpose, particularly for education and healthcare.

20. As we support the multi-stakeholder model of Internet governance, we call upon all stakeholders to contribute to enhanced cooperation within and between all international fora dealing with the governance of the Internet. In this regard, flexibility and transparency have to be maintained in order to adapt to the fast pace of technological and business developments and uses. Governments have a key role to play in this model.

21. We welcome the meeting of the e-G8 Forum which took place in Paris on 24 and 25 May, on the eve of our Summit and reaffirm our commitment to the kinds of multi-stakeholder efforts that have been essential to the evolution of the Internet economy to date. The innovative format of the e-G8 Forum allowed participation of a number of stakeholders of the Internet in a discussion on fundamental goals and issues for citizens, business, and governments. Its free and fruitful debate is a contribution for all relevant fora on current and future challenges.

22. We look forward to the forthcoming opportunities to strengthen international cooperation in all these areas, including the Internet Governance Forum scheduled next September in Nairobi and other relevant UN events, the OECD High Level Meeting on “The Internet Economy: Generating Innovation and Growth” scheduled next June in Paris, the London International Cyber Conference scheduled next November, and the Avignon Conference on Copyright scheduled next November, as positive steps in taking this important issue forward.

Anthony

Anthony J. Pennings, PhD has been on the NYU faculty since 2001 teaching digital media, information systems management, and global communications. © ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

LinkedIn Social Media IPO Raises Questions of a Global Internet Bubble

Posted on | May 26, 2011 | No Comments

Linkedin and the recent slew of Chinese Internet IPOs have both revitalized the IPO market and raised concerns about a new “dot-com” bubble. This time, though, it’s global. LinkedIn, the social media site for professionals was priced at $45 last Wednesday May 18, 2011 and closed Friday at over a $100 a share. The social media company was originally planning to offer 7.8 million shares at $32 to $35 giving the company a valuation of over $3 billion but the equity markets thought differently and collectively valued the company at $80. Is a company with last years earnings of $15.4 million worth some $8-9 billion? What does it mean for upcoming planned IPOs such as auto and mortgage lender Ally, embedded semiconductor device maker Freescale, coupon coordinator Groupon, material science innovator Momentive, and retail brand ToysRus? Not to mention media darlings Facebook and Twitter? Are we headed for another Internet bubble with its inevitable crash?

Here are 5 factors driving social media stocks:

First. The good news is that the benefits of social media and e-commerce are proving significant and real – largely due to their global reach, rich multimedia, cloud storage capabilities and viral strategies that utilize network effects to reach huge numbers of people quickly and cheaply. The Internet’s new mobility has gone beyond laptops to netbooks, smartphones and tablets such as the Apple iPad and Blackberry Playbook and have meant much more activity on the net and many more clicks for content providers and eyeballs for advertisers.

Second. Social media continues and accelerates the Internet’s globalization imperative. Although censorship exists and countries can and often block aspects of the Internet such as Facebook and Twitter, the web has continued to become an important part of the daily lives of people from countries around the world. As the above video mentioned, Linkedin has over 56 million of its 100+ million users from outside the US. Cities like Abuja, Cairo, Bangkok, Jakarta, and Rio de Janeiro have some of the most prolific social media user populations.

Third. We continue to see an economic recovery in the US since the financial crises of 2007-2009 and even faster growth in the BRIC countries. Lower interest rates have been a factor due to the to the US Federal Reserve’s “petal to the metal” financial intervention and mediocre fiscal stimulation by the government have placed the US on a firmer though still shaky economic foundation. Meanwhile growth around the world has proceeded on a faster pace despite rising commodity prices.

Fourth. Global exchanges and investment banks are hungry to list the new social media companies and for the trading activity they can bring in, especially with peaking asset prices. The lower interest rates have meant that cheap money has been scooped up by big speculators who have been able to borrow a lot of money due to liberal margin requirements to ride a number of other appreciating assets, including the stocks of the DJIA that has gone from a low of 6,470 on March 6, 2009 up to the current trading range around 12,300. Traders have also sent gold to over $1450 and oil to $100 a barrel for an unprecedented period of time. With these assets reaching significant valuation heights, investors are starting to look elsewhere. Why not social media?

Fifth. Another factor is the role of the so-called secondary markets that facilitate the exchange of shares in privately held companies. Much of the action is taking place in online exchanges where companies like Facebook or Zynga are not required to disclose financial information. One of these private exchanges, Secondmarket.com/ reported more than $100 million in private stock transactions during the first few months of 2011, primarily in shares of social media companies like Facebook and LinkedIn. These secondary markets have gone online to provide an environment for buying and selling previously illiquid assets like unregistered stocks and warrants, commercial loans, and a variety of corporate and residential mortgage-backed securities. Employees of these unlisted companies, for example, are often tempted to cash in their shares. Social media stocks of pre-IPO companies have proved to some of the most popular as companies delay listing on major exchanges because the threshold for listing is so high. Add the fact that the hype on these stocks has gone viral and the actual amounts available are low, the high demand for limited supply is forcing prices to rise.

Anthony

Anthony J. Pennings, PhD has been on the NYU faculty since 2001 teaching digital media, information systems management, and global communications. © ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

« go backkeep looking »
  • Referencing this Material

    Copyrights apply to all materials on this blog but fair use conditions allow limited use of ideas and quotations. Please cite the permalinks of the articles/posts.
    Citing a post in APA style would look like:
    Pennings, A. (2015, April 17). Diffusion and the Five Characteristics of Innovation Adoption. Retrieved from https://apennings.com/characteristics-of-digital-media/diffusion-and-the-five-characteristics-of-innovation-adoption/
    MLA style citation would look like: "Diffusion and the Five Characteristics of Innovation Adoption." Anthony J. Pennings, PhD. Web. 18 June 2015. The date would be the day you accessed the information. View the Writing Criteria link at the top of this page to link to an online APA reference manual.

  • About Me

    Professor at State University of New York (SUNY) Korea since 2016. Moved to Austin, Texas in August 2012 to join the Digital Media Management program at St. Edwards University. Spent the previous decade on the faculty at New York University teaching and researching information systems, digital economics, and strategic communications.

    You can reach me at:

    apennings70@gmail.com
    anthony.pennings@sunykorea.ac.kr

    Follow apennings on Twitter

  • About me

  • Writings by Category

  • Flag Counter
  • Pages

  • Calendar

    January 2025
    M T W T F S S
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    2728293031  
  • Disclaimer

    The opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of my employers, past or present.