Anthony J. Pennings, PhD


Adam Smith, the Census Machine, and the Beginnings of IBM

Posted on | June 20, 2011 | No Comments

This is the third in a five part exploration of Adam Smith and how his ideas laid the foundation for information technology (IT). Here I specifically explore connections between his theories and the the formation of IBM which last week celebrated its 100th birthday.

This post further develops the thesis that Adam Smith’s new conception of the wealth set the foundation for modern information practices and calculating technologies. The premise of this section is that the new system of economic understanding engendered by Adam Smith, the Scottish philosopher and author of the Wealth of Nations (1776), laid an important intellectual foundation for modern information technologies. Smith contended that wealth lied not in the riches gathered by the monarch but rather in the enterprise and productivity of the population. This had the effect of helping to transform a system of calculation, “political arithmatik”, designed to tally the wealth of the sovereign, into statistics (“state-tistics”), a system of measuring a wide range of economic and social activities.

While Smith is mainly known for his notion of the “invisible hand”; that God had infused the world with a regulatory system based on individual human desiring, his reconceptualization of governmental wealth reverberated through time to stimulate the development of information technologies. This “Smith Effect” grows in importance, especially as modern computerized bureaucracies emerge and “electronic” monetary policy becomes heavily reliant on the surveying capacity of modern information techniques. Smith, while generally accredited with ideas used to argue for the limitation of the state, also set the foundations for modern bureaucratic states and extensive systems of surveillance dependent on information technologies.

This new direction in governmental activities led to continual interest and innovations in mechanical calculations and statistical measurements.

Consequently, it resulted in Herman Hollerith’s tabulating machines, created for the 1890 US Census and eventually became the foundational product that led to the formation of International Business Machines (IBM). The Constitutional Convention of 1787 mandated the counting of Americans every ten years, but by the late 19th century the American population had increased to the point where calculations were nearly impossible to compute using non-mechanical means. Immigration surged after the Civil War and the whole idea of census-taking nearly became obsolete because of the complexity of the task. By the time one census was finished, it was almost time to do the next one.

Hollerith’s machine became an immediate success and prospered largely due to the process of “Morganization” occurring in major companies at the time as J.P. Morgan was consolidating a number of similar companies under names such as AT&T, General Electric, New York Central Railroad, and US Steel. These companies had large data processing needs that required the telegraph for transmitting information from various locations to tabulating machines that would aggregate information for reports to upper management. Failing in health Hollerith sold his business to Charles Flint in 1911 who merged the enterprise with two other companies to form the Computing Tabulating Recording Corporation. IBM is celebrating this merger as its centennial marker this year.

CTR changed its name to International Business Machines (IBM) in 1924 after it purchased German tabulating firm Deutsche Hollerith Maschinen Groupe (Dehomag). Under the leadership of former NCR and indicted supersalesmen, Thomas Watson, IBM had expanded to other countries interested in tallying their own populations. In the 1920s and 1930s, IBM began to comb the world, selling its tabulating machines and personalized census services to countries like Russia and Nazi Germany.

In the US, IBM got the Social Security contract that supported them through the Great Depression. Former IBM salesman Ross Perot would follow that model by getting Medicare contracts to help build his company EDS. He is shown in this video below about Thomas Watson, Jr. who guided the IBM into the electronic computer age during the Cold War.



AnthonybwAnthony J. Pennings, PhD is Professor and Associate Chair of the Department of Technology and Society, State University of New York, Korea. Before joining SUNY, he taught at Hannam University in South Korea and from 2002-2012 was on the faculty of New York University. Previously, he taught at St. Edwards University in Austin, Texas, Marist College in New York, and Victoria University in New Zealand. He has also spent time as a Fellow at the East-West Center in Honolulu, Hawaii.

  • Categories

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Crossword Puzzle

  • Referencing this Material

    Copyrights apply to all materials on this blog but fair use conditions allow limited use of ideas and quotations. Please cite the permalinks of the articles/posts.
    Citing a post in APA style would look like:
    Pennings, A. (2015, April 17). Diffusion and the Five Characteristics of Innovation Adoption. Retrieved from
    MLA style citation would look like: "Diffusion and the Five Characteristics of Innovation Adoption." Anthony J. Pennings, PhD. Web. 18 June 2015. The date would be the day you accessed the information. View the Writing Criteria link at the top of this page to link to an online APA reference manual.

  • About Me

    Professor at State University of New York (SUNY) Korea since 2016. Moved to Austin, Texas in August 2012 to join the Digital Media Management program at St. Edwards University. Spent the previous decade on the faculty at New York University teaching and researching information systems, digital economics, and strategic communications.

    You can reach me at:

    Follow apennings on Twitter

  • About me

  • Writings by Category

  • Flag Counter
  • Pages

  • Calendar

    December 2022
    M T W T F S S
  • Disclaimer

    The opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of my employers, past or present.