Gathering for iAMDA’s Mobile Art Conference, NYC
Posted on | October 27, 2010 | No Comments
“Is that a studio in your pocket, or are you just happy to see me?”
That was the motto/theme of the concluding event of the iAMDA MobileCon 2010 NYMobile Art Conference in New York City that ended in a Soho gallery with wall displays and an interactive exhibition featuring artistic work done on Androids, iPads, iPhones and other mobile devices.
Dozens of artists from all over the world had been collaborating and sharing their creations on Facebook, Flickr and other social media in anticipation of the event organized by David Scott Leibowitz and others. This group, that included fine artists, illustrators, and photographers, came together on the weekend ending October 24th, 2010 to explore, share and celebrate the creative capabilities of these new devices.
I was struck by David’s explanation of how important social media was to the organization and success of the conference. Flickr and other photo-sharing sites like Fotki provide a unique environment for creating interaction and building a community. They provide the “long tail” storage and distribution system that makes storing and sharing unique photos economical. Captioning and photo annotation engage other visitors when participants add metatags and comments to each other’s content. Flickr benefits from the user created content and the new visitors and potential subscribers it brings in.
As Amy Shuen explains, Flickr creates user value by opening up content for large numbers of users, by building contexts for user interaction, and through creating better search options through user-generated meta information such as tag clouds and notes. In her Web 2.0: A Strategy Guide, she explains how users gather around common interests that amplify group social network effects and how users bring other users, creating what is known as the viral effect. The conference drew on this collective user value to create a community of shared interest with enough momentum to gather together at New York University for their conference.
Artists do what they always do, they take the newest materials and techniques and stretch the limits of representation and meaning. In the end, while I enjoyed the art that had been transferred from individual devices to the exhibit’s walls and projected displays, I also marveled at the creation of a global community of artists exploring the realms of these new mobile devices with the creative and collaborative technologies of social media.
Anthony J. Pennings, PhD has been on the NYU faculty since 2001 teaching digital media and the political economy of international communications.
Tags: David Scott Leibowitz > iAMDA > long tail > Mobile Art Conference > Sketchbook Mobile
East-West Center Scholarships
Posted on | October 23, 2010 | No Comments
These scholarships are available for NYU students. The deadline is Nov 1.
The top one, EAST-WEST CENTER GRADUATE DEGREE FELLOWSHIP (GDF) is particularly good as it provides a full scholarship including housing and living allowance. I was lucky to get one for my MA and two years for my PhD (four years maximum) so I would be happy to answer any questions.
One of our DCOM students, Shawn Hall, received an ASIA-PACIFIC LEADERSHIP PROGRAM (APLP) scholarship. Shawn recently finished his MBA from NYU Polytechnic.
Barack Obama’s mother and step-father from Indonesia met as degree fellows at the EWC and his sister Maya Soetoro-Ng, who got her PhD from NYU, works there now. It will also host the APEC meeting in 2011.
World Statistics Day
Posted on | October 20, 2010 | No Comments
“On this first World Statistics Day I encourage the international community to work with the United Nations to enable all countries to meet their statistical needs.”
– BAN KI-MOON
Secretary-General of the United Nations
Message on World Statistics Day, 20-10-20
Our book Computerization and Development in Southeast Asia, while not specifically about statistics, pointed to the extensive use of this technology for statistical use. Research into the first uses of computers in “developing” countries showed that they were used primarily in census and other population-oriented statistics. Thailand’s very first computers for example, were both second generation IBM 1401s (Second generation signifies the replacement of vacuum tubes with transistors), installed for the International Census Society Programme and the National Statistical Office in 1963. It followed up this project with a nationwide information system called the Population Registration and Information System Improvement Project to emend the registration of vital statistics and modernise the postal delivery system. Another project was intent on developing a personal identification system with identity numbers indicating a range of information from birth dates to fingerprints and occupation.
Recently I have been exploring the history of statistics and its role in the early development of information technologies with my work on the The Smith Effect II: From Political Arithmetik to “State-istics” to IT
Tags: Anthony Pennings > BAN KI-MOON > Computerization and Development in Asia > IBM 1401 > Secretary-General of the United Nations > state-istics > Syed Rahim > World Statistics Day
Factors Establishing the Feasibility of Global E-Commerce
Posted on | October 19, 2010 | No Comments
The advent of global e-commerce emerged out of a unique combination of economic, political, and technological circumstances during the 1990s. The following is a partial list of influential events that led to its development.
- The fall of the Berlin Wall and the Communist USSR bloc meant the world was no longer significantly divided by Cold War antagonisms and a pan-capitalist condition of free flows of information and money began to spread globally.
- The first Gulf War demonstrated a new found optimism in the US capability to conduct conventional warfare and police “rogue nations” with “smart bombs” and spy satellites, regenerating America’s belief in high technology and the power of the microprocessor.
- Digital monetarism’s global techno-financial regime, led ideologically by the “Washington Consensus”, continued to discipline countries around the world into modernizing their telecommunications and deregulating their political economies to the global flows of capital and news.
- The Internet had emerged by first connecting universities and research centers and then opening up to commercial activities with a series of new “killer apps”: email, FTP (File Transfer Protocol) and Gopher.
- Tim Berners Lee at Europe’s largest nuclear research center proposed a communication system with hypertext features to facilitate communication among scientists that he called with World Wide Web. This became the technical foundation for the “click” dynamics of the Internet.
- The multimedia browser was invented by a group of university students that allowed users from a wide spectrum of society to “surf” the World Wide Web. They would go on to form Netscape whose Initial Public Offering (IPO) would start a major investment boom in tech companies while the browser would provide the basic platform to conduct e-commerce.
- The FCC had made distinctions between voice and data during the 1980s that allowed users to log long periods of Internet surfing without paying exorbitant phone bills, although it meant using the relatively slow 28.8 kbps and 56kbps modems of the time.
- A new proactive Democratic government in the US pushed forward new domestic telecommunications legislation in 1996 that spurred widespread interest in the sector while its global activism helped solidify support for a the “global information infrastructure” (GII).
- The World Trade Organization (WTO) was formed in 1995 and resulted in two quick agreements that liberalized telecommunications and sales of information technologies as 60 nation-states agreed to open up their markets.
- Capital markets became enthused about the “tech stocks” and poured money into the notorious “dot-com” and other companies involved in the “new economy” of Internet-based electronic commerce including telecommunications. Financial destabilization increased investment rush to the US as financial shocks in the world financial system resulted in money from Asia and other distressed economies finding “safe haven” in the American stock markets.
- IT and particularly the Internet became a “media event” in itself as television, magazines, newspapers, websites, and particularly the new business channels such as Bloomberg, CNBC, and CNNfn constantly reported on the potential of the “new economy”.
- Search engines made the information on the web much more accessible and began to offer more sophisticated, yet easy to use methods for advertising.
- Software concerns over the new millennium sparked major interest and purchases of new computer systems in order to avoid computer system failure on January 1st, 2000. As businesses gave up their legacy systems they looked to integrate new systems that did more than provide “back-office” capabilities. IT was seen to be able to interface more directly with sales and customer services.
Of course, this list is incomplete, but it’s a start at examining one of the most important trends in human commerce and the future of the web.
© ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Anthony J. Pennings, PhD is the Professor of Global Media at Hannam University in South Korea. Previously, he taught at St. Edwards University in Austin, Texas and was on the faculty of New York University from 2002-2012. He also taught at Victoria University in Wellington, New Zealand and was a Fellow at the East-West Center in Hawaii in the 1990s.
var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-20637720-1']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);
(function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })();
Tags: digital monetarism > global information infrastructure (GII) > Gulf War > killer apps > pan-capitalist condition > Washington Consensus
Google: Monetizing the Automatrix
Posted on | October 18, 2010 | No Comments
Google recently announced its work on a driverless car to mixed reviews. While a technical success, with only one mishap in 140,000 miles of testing, many felt that Google was losing its focus. I think this latter view underestimates the Google strategy – to monetize the road.
As we move towards the “Automatrix,” the newly forming digital environment for transportation, Google looks to situate its search/advertising business at its center.
Let’s face it; the car is almost synonymous with shopping and consumerism. Whether going to the mall to buy some new shoes, picking up groceries, or going out to look for a new washing machine – the car transports both our bodies and our booty. Nothing in the fridge? Drive out to nearest Applebee, Dennys, or Olive Garden for some nachos and diet coke. Got kids? Try the drive-in for a Happy Meal or some Chuck E. Cheese’s pizza after a day at the water park. You get the point: have car, will spend. It’s American.
Google, who wants to organize the world’s information, clearly sees your car as a major generator of that data and the car occupants as major traffic generators – the good kind of traffic – on the web, not the road. They want the passenger to focus on the navigation, not the road. They want to provide destinations, stops, places to rest and refresh. The car will provide the movement while “the fingers do the walking,” to draw on a famous Yellow Pages ad. While AC Nielsen, famous for its ratings business, has championed the three screen advertising measurement (TV, PC, mobile phone), you could say is Google is going for a four-screen strategy: PC, mobile, TV, and now the dashboard. Talk about a captured audience! It has the potential to pay off big, adding billions more to Google’s bottom line by tying passengers to the web.
Can driving through downtown Newark, sitting at a light, or leaving a movie theater parking lot, really compete with the latest user-generated video on YouTube? As you drive to the airport, wouldn’t you rather be making dinner reservations or checking out entertainments at your flight destination? No, Route 66 is going to be route66.com because, well, Pops Restaurant bought the ad word and you would rather be enjoying a coke and burger anyway.
Actually, I’m all for computers driving my car, as long as they are doing it for other drivers as well. Yes, I enjoy the occasional thrill of driving and probably more, the relaxing feel from the directed focus of the activity. However, I prefer looking out the window, listening to music, and even reading a book. GPS has already rescued me from the travel maps as I now need reading glasses to see them anyway. Besides, the road is dangerous. It’s really scary passing that zigzagging car because the driver is zoning out in a conversation with his ex-wife or some teenager is texting the girl he has a crush on.
Sure, I have mixed feelings about sliding into the Automatrix. Taking over the steering wheel seems like a bit of a stretch, even for Moore’s Law modern day microprocessors. It will require a whole new framework for car safety testing. However, it has been over 40 years since they guided the Apollo spacecraft to Moon, so it makes sense to replace the current system of haphazard meat grinders we currently use.
© ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-20637720-1']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);
(function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })();
Tags: driverless car > Google > monetization strategy > three screen strategy
How IT Came to Rule the World-The Information Standard and Other Sovereignties
Posted on | October 3, 2010 | No Comments
President Nixon’s decision to close the gold window in 1971 signaled a dramatic shift in the US international financial policy and the future of the world political economy. The move largely meant the end of the containment of international finance set up at the end of World War II. No longer was the US constrained by the financial rules it set up during the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference at Bretton Woods, New Hampshire. Known more commonly as the Bretton Woods conference, leaders from the major Allied countries tied the US dollar to gold and major currencies around the world to the dollar. With the end of this de facto gold standard, a new type of global power emerged based on news flows, financial information, and computer and communications technologies.[1]
Empowered by new developments in computer services and data communications, currency markets turned electronic in the wake of Nixon’s decision. Banks throughout the world started to trade the US dollar, the British pound, the German mark, the French franc, the Russian ruble, the Italian lira, the Japanese yen, the Korean won, the Brazilian real and others. Traders bought and sold currencies, betting on the direction of price movements that had been previously pegged under the Bretton Woods rules. Through new electronic conduits and financial news services, they monitored economic information, military movements, political crises, and weather forecasts, all for the purpose of making instantaneous decisions about the viability of country’s money and other financial instruments.
This decision-making capability propelled financial traders, who Tom Wolfe called “the Masters of the Universe” in his (1987) Bonfire of the Vanities, into a major power. Through the vast funds that they accumulated in their portfolios they effectively began to discipline countries around the world through the force of their trading decisions. With the end of the gold standard’s discipline, a new power emerged based on the utility of global communications and information technologies, what Walter Wriston, the notorious and visionary Citibank CEO, called the “information standard” in his controversial book, The Twilight of Sovereignty.[2]
This global information standard became a sovereign power in itself. Nation-states and organizations were caught up in the opportunities and consequences of the new financial trading system that began to structure modern life along the dictates of a new techno-economic imperative. When Reuters offered international price information over data communication lines, it initiated the beginning of a global pan-optic market system that read and interpreted the world according to the regiment of electronic finance. This system expanded rapidly, globally, and comprehensively. It reached into the policies and practices of nearly every nation and organization, both private and public. Reuters caught a break when the Arab-Israeli War broke out in October of 1973, sending the newly freed currency markets into a frenzy and panicked dealers to their computer monitors. Reuter’s “Money Monitor Rates” became the news agency’s major source of revenue and a pioneer of the electronic marketplace.
While the mechanics of the information standard was based on its capability to develop virtual markets using the Reuters electronic news and trading system, the “energy” of the system was provided by the infusion of debt taken on by countries around the world. Ironically, it was the oil crises that created the surpluses of dollars that were lent to nation-states around the world. Addiction to oil drove the growth of the “eurodollars” – US monies outside its geographical boundaries that lead to that debt. Banks pressured countries around the world to take loans for a variety of projects. Growing national debt during the 1970s led to the so-called “Third World Debt Crisis” that blew up in the early 1980s, and gave financial traders substantial leverage within this global system of discipline.
The information standard began disciplining the world political economy and its nation-states into adopting an agenda that included: 1) privatizing government assets and agencies while capitalizing domestic industries on newly electronic stock markets; 2) deregulating domestic industries and taking down barriers to flows of capital and investment; 3) reducing government expenditures and increasing taxes to pay off debt; and; 4) disciplining labor forces into lower cost workers or innovating entrepreneurs. This new global political economy combined a new “free enterprise” fundamentalism led by Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan, with a system of unprecedented capital mobility.
Empowered by the calculative and organizing powers of the spreadsheet, global finance targeted debt-ridden governments and began a process of “privatizing” public assets such as airlines, broadcasting, electricity, transportation, oil fields and telecommunications by valuing assets, creating state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and then finally selling them off as corporate entities to global institutional investors such as pension and sovereign funds. Most significantly, government-owned telecommunications systems were sold off and listed on domestic and international share markets in a process called “privatizing.” These former PTTs (Post, Telephone and Telegraph) eventually incorporated Internet Protocols (IP) and began opening up to the World Wide Web and its flows of capital, news, global e-commerce and social media.
Public and private institutions began to succumb to the new logic of digital finance and a system of hyper-real representational strategies. Both types of organizations fell under the discipline of the financial markets with the former particularly susceptible to bond and currency traders, while the latter continued under constant surveillance by the stock markets and lenders. Central to this emerging regime of “digital monetarism” was the knowledge disciplines of accounting and finance, that congealed their techniques into a new tool, the electronic spreadsheet. The original “killer app” of the personal computer revolution, this versatile program allowed the widespread calculation of financial formulas and “what-if” scenarios allowing the plotting of a wide variety of corporate acquisitions, initial public offerings (IPOs), leveraged buyouts (LBOs), and mergers.
The use of the electronic spreadsheet exploded after IBM introduced its own “Personal Computer” in August of 1981. Soon after, Lotus 1-2-3 became available for the “PC” and all the “IBM-compatible” clones such as Compaq and Dell. Lotus 1-2-3 was named for its spreadsheet, graphing, and database capabilities that combined to produce an extraordinary new facility to both conceptually and textually organize financial information. Lotus 1-2-3 didn’t make the transition to the graphical user interface and Microsoft’s Excel, originally developed for the Apple Macintosh became the dominant spreadsheet application.
In a new era of spreadsheet capitalism, countries were forced to succumb to a new logic of numerical, graphical and textual representations – a realm of computerized hyper-mediated information organized around the techno-economic imperative. Money emerged as a leveraging factor and VisiCalc, Lotus 1-2-3 and Excel became new tools of control and discipline. Facilitated by high-speed network technologies and powerful trading workstations, the information standard began to subject organizations, both public and private, to a new international discipline. Combined with innovations in mathematical algorithms, global money morphed into a variety of financial instruments traded in electronic “dark pools” and on interconnected financial exchanges.
The world economy began to undergo what Harvey called a “time-space compression” due to new permissive technologies such as jet airplanes and IP-based telecommunications. [3] This has meant a shift from vertically-organized to new networked organizations that privilege inter-organizational ties by such means as outsourcing and sub-contracting. Spatial and temporal dimensions of the economy are being reorganized in the need to reduce turnover times for flexible production and marketing strategies on a global scale. For example, coordinating the logistics of containerization, inventory control, and packaging needed to compete in the new marketplace requires contact with a wide of array of competing services.
Notes
[1] A classic source on Bretton Woods was Moffit, M. (1983) The World’s Money. NY: Simon & Schuster, Inc.
[2] Wriston’s interpretation of the Information Standard The Twilight of Sovereignty: How the Information Revolution Is Transforming Our World was organized around a rhetoric of assurance, not a critical analysis. He argued the power of multinational corporations, nation-state dictatorships, and any aggregation of power antithetical to democratic prospects will fall to the sovereign power of the information standard.
[3] Harvey, D. (1989) The Condition of Post-Modernity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. p. 147.
© ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Anthony J. Pennings, PhD is the Professor of Global Media at Hannam University in South Korea. Previously, he taught at St. Edwards University in Austin, Texas and was on the faculty of New York University from 2002-2012. He also taught at Victoria University in Wellington, New Zealand and was a Fellow at the East-West Center in Hawaii in the 1990s.
var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-20637720-1']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);
(function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })();
Tags: Bonfire of the Vanities > Bretton Woods > gold window > Information Standard > leveraged buyouts > Masters of the Universe > PTTs > Reuters > spreadsheet capitalism > Walter Wriston
How IT Came to Rule the World: Transformation of the Internet
Posted on | October 1, 2010 | No Comments
A remarkable transformation took shape in the few short years between the Internet’s 25th anniversary in 1994 and the end of the millennium. During these six years, the Internet transformed from a very novel but quaint system for sending ASCII email messages, transferring files, and linking homepages into a global system of electronic communications and commerce. What was once a tiny network linking a handful of university and research institute mainframes soon expanded to include small workstations, personal computers, laptops, and mobile wireless devices. The Internet was no longer confined to campuses, but could be accessed from homes, offices, cars, and even on the move.
The Promise of E-Commerce
What sparked this transition in such a short time? The Internet’s new uses were varied, but it was clear that its potential for global e-commerce was attracting investment capital of staggering proportions. The Clinton Administration followed a set of national policies that supported the development of a “national information infrastructure”, wired schools, and the development of e-commerce. These included a moratorium on taxes, privatization of radio spectrum, the creation of a domain registration administration, and a new pro-competitive policy framework, the Telecommunications Act of 1996.
Global Flows of Cash
Consequently, venture capitalists and the financial markets began to dramatically fund technology and “dot.com” companies. Individual investors also got involved through mutual funds, work-place pension accounts, 401K’s, and new online trading brokerages such as Ameritrade and E*Trade. Capital returning from “Emerging Markets” of Asia and the former USSR during the international financial crises of 1997 and 1998 streamed into the coffers of Internet startups, leading to stark competition in the race to develop the most effective and profitable e-commerce sites. Some called it “The New Economy.”
Companies such as Amazon.com, eBay, RealNetworks, and Yahoo as well as associated “tech” stocks such as Cisco, Dell Computers, and Intel became the darlings of investors. Even America Online, with a somewhat ancillary history, was able to take advantage of the share markets to raise money to buy Netscape and Time-Warner and stake out a considerable presence on the World Wide Web. Billions of dollars poured into the development of new companies for business to consumer (B2C) and business to business (B2B) interchange. With this cash they were able to integrate and use a wide variety of traditional computer, media, and telecommunications such as legacy databases, cable networks, and satellite systems.
The Crash of 2000
By April 2000, the “dot.com” market started to dissipate. A combination of factors including new reporting requirements by the US Securities and Exchange Commission, brought a new discipline to the “dot.coms” and other technology stocks. The SEC required all public companies (except foreign companies and companies with less than $10 million in assets and 500 shareholders) to file periodic reports, registration statements, and other forms electronically through EDGAR, its Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval system.
The investment bubble collapsed with the preponderance of poor “earnings” reports, but for the most part, the technology and a substantial amount of skilled employees emerged to continue the process of globalizing electronic commerce.
Citation APA (7th Edition)
Pennings, A.J. (2010, Oct 1) How IT Came to Rule the World: Transformation of the Internet. apennings.com https://apennings.com/how-it-came-to-rule-the-world/transformation-of-the-internet/
© ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Anthony J. Pennings, PhD was on the New York University faculty from 2002-2012 teaching digital media, information systems management, and comparative political economy. He is currently a professor at the State University of New York in South Korea (SUNY Korea).
Tags: national information infrastructure > Telecommunications Act of 1996
Apple, Silicon Valley and the Counter-Cultural Impulse
Posted on | September 24, 2010 | No Comments
Power to the People
A curious subculture had been developing around the use of computers during the post-Vietnam War years of the 1970s. Working off the counter-cultural energy of the 1960s, it challenged “the establishment,” the political-corporate interests that had entangled America in the Indochina war. Then, in 1974, Ted Nelson, the originator of the hypertext concept, wrote a book called Computer Lib about the importance of decentralizing these machines. Subsequently, this book became a manifesto urging people to claim the power of computers for themselves and not leave it in the hands of the military and corporate elite.
Nelson’s agenda did not go unnoticed by the youth of Silicon Valley, particularly the future founders of Apple Computers, Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak. Coming of age in the early 1970s, they were heavily influenced by the emerging currents of music, poetry, and political philosophy. Sentiments against the Vietnam War and “The Establishment” were strong at the time and contributed to their view that the individual should be empowered by technological means. In 1976, they formed Apple and tapped the swelling counter-cultural rejection of the militarization and corporatization of computing.
From the crumbs of MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction) and the “Space Race,” these two impertinent young men started a small company that changed the face of computing. Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak were not from Jackson, Tennessee; Albany, Georgia; or Burlington, Vermont; but from a suburban complex of industries and small towns amalgamated by arms and the space races. Both grew up in a culture inundated with electronics – Silicon Valley. They had ready access to computer clubs, electronic surplus stores, trade shows, technical libraries, and an economic system of electronic production.
They did start Apple Computers in their garage. Still, the displaced car regularly drove through the streets of technologically-sophisticated suburbs bred and nurtured by the demands of the Cold War. Within this electronics-rich environment, they concocted a relatively primitive computer from readily available equipment in the Silicon Valley area. The first Apple computer was extraordinary for its size, price, and basic microprocessing abilities that together promised a future of individual empowerment through computing power.
Long before Vice-President Al Gore’s “e-rate” and National Information Infrastructure (NII) would democratize computer access for schoolchildren, Woz would have access to a PDP-8 computer in high school. When they started their business in Jobs’ garage, they had access to computer clubs, electronic surplus stores, corporate technical libraries, trade shows, and a culture of electronic engineering and production.
-
“The Woz was not the only student in Silicon Valley with such a dream. Actually, in some ways, he was fairly typical. Many students at Homestead High had parents in the electronics industry. Having grown up with the new technology around them, these kids were not intimidated by it. They were accustomed to watching their parents mess around with oscilloscopes and soldering irons. Homestead High also had teachers who encouraged their students’ interest in technology.”[1]
.
Apple was an offspring of the military-industrial complex, but it was rebellious. Wozniak and Jobs achieved “hacker” status early on because of their Blue-Box business. This device allowed them to make unlimited long-distance telephone calls at a time when they were actually expensive. Moreover, the telephone system was arguably the largest electrical machine in the world. Dominated by AT&T, the network had increasingly been attacked by “phone phreaks” who used various gadgets to mimic the electromagnetic tones used in the telephone system to route calls.
As Jobs told it, they created their Blue-Box after finding an AT&T technical journal at the Stanford Linear Accelerator, a massive device that assists basic research in nuclear physics. In one of the most famous cases, Wozniak, who would later invent the original Apple computer, called the Vatican in Rome to talk to the Pope. Impersonating Henry Kissinger, he failed to make it to the Pope, but he tells the story gleefully, and it stands as an interesting example of the impertinence and resourcefulness of this young subculture to try to use technology for its counter-cultural purposes.[2]
The Altair microcomputer caught the attention of the Homebrew Computer Club, an informal group that met at Stanford University during 1974 and 1975, the last years of the Vietnam War. This club was a strange brew of well-educated hobbyists and hippies living amid the military-industrial complex while heavily influenced by the counterculture movement. Members of this group once got the Altair to play music by placing a transistor radio next to the microcomputer to pick up on the electrical energies sent out by the Altair. They actually programmed it to play the Beatles’ “Fool on the Hill.”
Two regular group members at the Homebrew Computer Club were recent high school graduates who worked nearby in the computer industry. Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak also viewed the Altair but began to receive a lot of attention when they brought in their own microcomputer. The scene is dramatized in the movie Pirates of Silicon Valley. As Jobs says, “I never had a problem with the Altair, until I tried to use it.” Of course, it was the Altair that inspired Bill Gates to leave Harvard and get into the software business.
On April 1, 1976, they started Apple Computers. The name reportedly came from Jobs’ belief that the Apple was the perfect fruit. It has high nutritional value, tastes good, and comes in an attractive, protective package.[3] But Jobs’ genuine concern was a type of spiritual nutrition that he thought was lacking in modern society and certainly in the dominant computer industry. His dream was to sell “the first real packaged computer” that could empower and help enlighten the individual.
Jobs and Wozniak decided not to go with the 8080 chip that was fascinating to the Homebrew crowd and chose instead to go with a variation of a Motorola chip. Motorola was one of the original licensees of Bell Labs’ transistor and continued to play an important role in chip design and production. Its 6800 family of microchips, in particular, had a substantial impact on the emergence of the microcomputer. Several of its employees left to form a computer called MOS Technology that released an imitative chip called the 6502. MOS was soon sold to Commodore computers that used the 6502 in its well-regarded computers. It was the 6502 that became a workhorse for the Acorn, Atari, and Commodore microcomputers. Perhaps most importantly, it was readily and cheaply available by 1976 and used by a new company called Apple Computers.[4]
Silicon Valley was not really interested in microcomputers. Instead, they saw their markets as military systems and other industrial products, such as manufacturing sensors. The two kids from Apple, however, managed to find enough venture capital to produce a small number of computers. Jobs, a fruitarian at the time, went to Arthur Rock, a venture capitalist, for money to get the company off the ground. Rock had originally funded Intel and referred them to a recent Intel retiree, Mike Markula, who became an important part of Apple’s management team. With the new funding, they contracted with a local company to build 1,000 computers. The Apple II was launched at the West Coast Computer Fair in 1978. It was a big hit, and they signed up distributors. Initially, the market was hobbyists, but Apple soon began to market education and business.
It was Apple Computers that first implemented the smaller 5-¼ inch disk drive. Wozniak redesigned the controller chips for the disk drive into a more elegant configuration. He reduced the number needed from around fifty to five chips, reducing the required space in Apple II for chips considerably. Shugart Associates was a leader in developing the 5-¼ inch floppy that it sold to Apple. The new floppy drive system allowed many third-party software developers to produce and market software that could be easily installed and used on the microcomputer.[6] Apple sold the new device, which could hold 113 Kbytes of information, for $495. The drives were important, not just for storing data, but they would prove crucial for distributing software applications.
While Woz earned his title as the “Mozart of digital design” through his design of the Apple II, Jobs helped conceive the computer as a democratizing tool with the motto-“One person–one computer.”[5] The microcomputer was sold as a tool that would balance the unequal relationship between institutions and the individual. It would empower the individual and allow their inner artist to emerge. The Apple II Computer became the darling of the counter-cultural crowd. It would remain a symbol of resistance against the corporate forces of IBM and, later, the predatory practices of Microsoft.
The message here is not that computer creativity could only emerge in the midst of the military-industrial complex, but rather that context matters. Enabling infrastructures matter. Later the Internet would spread the opportunities available to youth through PCs and dial-up capabilities connecting to ISPs allowing webpages that could be easily built with HTML, gifs, and Adobe Photoshop jpegs.
Notes
[1] Quote about Steve Wozniak “Woz” from a chapter called “The Prankster” in Freiberger, P. and Swaine, M. (2000) Fire in the Valley: The Making of the Personal Computer. Second Edition. NY: McGraw-Hill. p. 255.
[2] Triumph of the Nerds video.
[3] The Apple name from http://apple2history.org/history/ah02.html accessed July 6, 2005.
[4] Useful information on Zilog and Motorola chips came from George Gilder’s Microcosm. p. 108-112.
[5] Wozniak as the Mozart of digital design from Triumph of the Nerds video, Part One.
[6] Apple’s new floppy disk proved decisive. From Paul E. Ceruzzi’s A History of Modern Computing. Second Edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. p. 266-267.
Citation APA (7th Edition)
Pennings, A.J. (2010, Sept 11). Apple, Silicon Valley, and the Counter-Cultural Impulse. apennings.com https://apennings.com/dystopian-economies/apple-and-the-counter-cultural-impulse/
© ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Anthony J. Pennings, PhD has been on the NYU faculty since 2001 teaching digital media, information systems management, and global political economy.
Tags: 6800 > Altair > Apple Computers > Arthur Rock > AT&T > Computer Lib > e-rate > Homebrew Computer Club > MOS > phone phreaks > Pirates of Silicon Valley > Silicon Valley > Space Race > Ted Nelson > The Personal Computer > Woz